Taken in the Fourth Quarter of Sunday's Game |
Sunday was just about the perfect day for our at-least-once annual football pilgrimage to Green Bay . It was a fall-like, slightly cool but sunny day
in the final days of summer. Judy, Sam
and I had an uneventful drive up from Chicago, we met old and new friends Marc
and Kathy for lunch in Oshkosh, we parked a block and a half from the stadium,
thanks to Marc, and we waltzed into the
stadium with plenty of time to hear former Packer defensive end Esera Tuaolo
sing a beautiful (but hard to sing along) rendition of the National Anthem (excerpt here). The Packers were ready for their home opener
after the crushing defeat at the hands of the Seahawks 10 days earlier. Surely nothing would spoil the beautiful
pageant of the home opener in Green
Bay .
And then the game started. Aaron Rodgers fumbled away the snap on the
first play from scrimmage, the Jets capitalized on the short field by scoring a
touchdown, and the game just got worse from that point. The Packers were down, in the second quarter, by the
score of 21-3, before starting their comeback.
The three of us never said this out loud, but comparing notes on the
drive back to Chicago ,
we all thought it was a lost cause. Then
you start focusing on such matters as the meager chances for an 0-2
team to make the playoffs, and before too long you start thinking about another
lost season in the limited years left in Rodgers’ career.
Fortunately, the Packers had not given up on the game yet, and chipped
away at the Jets’ lead. 21-6, then 21-9,
thanks to the longest field goal ever kicked by a Packers’ kicker in LambeauField. They even tried one of those
“pop-up” style onside kicks, which failed.
This put the Jets in position to increase their lead at halftime, until
the play of the game. Mike Daniels rushed Geno
Smith, and hit him just as he released the ball, resulting in a Tramon Williams interception at the 3 yard line, just after the two minute warning. And what do you know? The Packers put together a 97 yard drive for
a touchdown, and suddenly it was a new ballgame.
There were lots of interesting and some weird plays in this game. There was the Jordy Nelson 80 yard touchdown. I
really thought the Jets would catch him, but Nelson proved that he is
faster than I realize. There was the 4th
down Geno Smith touchdown pass to tie the game, that wasn’t actually a play at all,
because Jets’ assistant coach Marty Mornhinweg or one of the Jets defensive players had (illegally) called a timeout
(illegal because only the head coach can call a timeout on the sideline).
Why were the Packers so bad in the first half, and how did
they manage to turn it around? Brother-in-law
Bruce (watching on TV) pointed out that Derek Sherrod was stinking up the joint in
the first half. He was indeed, and the offensive line was providing very
little protection overall to Rodgers, and opening very few holes for Eddie Lacy. It didn't help that Rodgers was holding the ball too long, either. Another thought that I saw expressed somewhere related to the Packers’ heavy
reliance on a 4-3 defense. This was a closely guarded secret in the preseason,
and as a result was not practiced in public or used during the preseason games.
I suppose the idea was to surprise the Seahawks last week, but that strategy backfired since (a) the Seahawks won easily; and (b) the lack of full speed hitting and practice time meant that the players really weren't ready to use the 4-3. But maybe the defense finally started to gel after the first 6 quarters of the season, and they were much more effective in the second half. Time will tell whether, as Sherrod gets more comfortable, and/or Bryan Bulaga returns, the offensive line protection improves, and time will also tell whether the defense continues to improve after finally getting things together in the second half. Finally, and quite importantly, Rodgers started getting rid of the ball faster on most plays, which in turn opened up the possibility of making some of the longer-developing plays work better.
I suppose the idea was to surprise the Seahawks last week, but that strategy backfired since (a) the Seahawks won easily; and (b) the lack of full speed hitting and practice time meant that the players really weren't ready to use the 4-3. But maybe the defense finally started to gel after the first 6 quarters of the season, and they were much more effective in the second half. Time will tell whether, as Sherrod gets more comfortable, and/or Bryan Bulaga returns, the offensive line protection improves, and time will also tell whether the defense continues to improve after finally getting things together in the second half. Finally, and quite importantly, Rodgers started getting rid of the ball faster on most plays, which in turn opened up the possibility of making some of the longer-developing plays work better.
On the rental car shuttle on Monday morning, we ran into two
very personable (and very New York !)
Jets fans, a father and son, in their 60’s and 30’s, respectively. They had obviously enjoyed their weekend very
much, couldn’t say enough nice things about Lambeau Field and the Packers fans,
despite their disappointment in the final result, and were already making plans
to visit another historic stadium next year. "Look, we're from New York," the father said, and we all laughed without letting him finish the thought. I believe that his point was that if anybody is going to abrasively irritate the local fans, it would be New Yorkers, but the fans were still as nice as could be. The father, while wishing the Packers well, was quick to say that he
thinks the Packers may be in trouble.
His feeling is that they are a very good team, but not a great team, and that they will probably make
the playoffs, but probably again won’t go very far. This is another way of saying, "settle down, it was just the Jets."
He might be right, but I am betting that he is wrong. The Packers obviously need a lot of
improvement, but my feeling is (until proven wrong) that they can continue to improve as
the year goes on. Against most defenses,
Eddie Lacy can gain a lot more yards than he did on Sunday, which in turn will
keep Aaron Rodgers upright, and result in more points without requiring a
career day from Jordy Nelson. As for the
defense, I am more skeptical, since the defense has chronically under-performed
starting with the 2011 season. But maybe
there is something to the idea that the Packers haven’t yet had enough
full-speed action in the 4-3, and as a result the 4-3 package will become ever
more effective as the year goes on.
On a side note, we definitely had the impression Sunday that the Packers fans are louder now than in years past. With the addition of about 7,000 new seats in the South End Zone, and the changed acoustics created by the higher seating area in that end zone, it might make sense that the stadium can get louder now. The same seats were there last year, of course, but the only game we got to was the Eagles game, a game in which the Packers never led, started no. 2 quarterback Seneca Wallace, and had to replace him with no. 3 quarterback Scott Tolzien. So there was not a lot to cheer about that particular day.
On a side note, we definitely had the impression Sunday that the Packers fans are louder now than in years past. With the addition of about 7,000 new seats in the South End Zone, and the changed acoustics created by the higher seating area in that end zone, it might make sense that the stadium can get louder now. The same seats were there last year, of course, but the only game we got to was the Eagles game, a game in which the Packers never led, started no. 2 quarterback Seneca Wallace, and had to replace him with no. 3 quarterback Scott Tolzien. So there was not a lot to cheer about that particular day.
The Lions are next up, and fans know that they are a tough
match-up for the Packers in the dome. I
am not expecting a dominant victory by the Packers, but I do expect them to
win, probably in a high-scoring affair.
No comments:
Post a Comment