 |
| Rodgers Greets Hundley After the Decisive TD Pass |
Please allow me to have a large snack of crow (or
Raven, given this week's game). I had seen nothing in the last 3 games to
suggest that Hundley was capable of having as good a game as he had against the
Bears on Sunday, or that the Packers' defense is capable of stopping anybody
with consistency, over a full 60 minute game. But the Packers did both in
beating the Bears, 23-16, at Soldier Field. Now, let's not get too
excited, it is only the Bears, but still, what a nice little win to keep the
Packers' season interesting for at least another week or two.
On the bad news/good news front, Aaron Jones injured his
knee during the first quarter, Ty Montgomery (re) injured his ribs in the
second quarter, and Brett Hundley injured his hamstring, although nobody
outside the Packers organization knew about Hundley's injury until after the
game. It appeared to me as if the injury probably happened early in the
game, as Hundley didn't seem to have as much "escapability" in the
pocket as I expected. But the Packers were able to keep things rolling,
even with Jamaal Williams, their third string running back, and with an injured
Brett Hundley.
By far the funniest play of the day (if not the year) was
Coach Fox's challenge of a ruling in the first half. Cunningham, the
Bears' running back, was trying to get to the end zone, and was diving for the
pylon. He was ruled out of bounds at the 2. Fox challenged,
claiming he did not step out of bounds, and it was a TD when he reached out and
touched the pylon with the ball. On review, the determination was made
that (1) he never stepped out of bounds; but (2) he lost control of the ball as
he was reaching for the pylon, so when the loose ball hit the pylon, it became
Packers ball and a touchback. You could sort of see this in the first
several angles shown on TV, if you were really looking for it, but it was not
obvious. The people upstairs who advised Fox to challenge it had
obviously not seen the one shot that clearly, and without the slightest doubt,
shows that the ball had come loose before hitting the pylon. So what
seemed like a slightly aggressive challenge (after all, they would have had the
ball on the 2 yard line, anyway), turned into a disastrous
miscalculation. And that was a key play in the game, as the Bears were seemingly
poised to tie up the game, 10-10, but for the ill-considered challenge.
So the Packers find themselves at 5-4, in at least
theoretical contention for a wild card spot, and with the Ravens coming to
town. Heck, they are tied with a bunch of teams for the wild card spots
at 5-4, but the Falcons and Lions would beat them out based on head-to-head
record. Meanwhile, fan enthusiasm for the Packers seems to be waning, and
what with a Rodgers-less Packers team, and the start of the hunting season,
tickets are selling for well below face value for this game. Can they keep
it going against the bye-rested, 4-5 Ravens? Every game they win now
keeps things interesting; every game they lose approaches a nail in the
coffin. Before Rodgers' injury, everyone would have assumed that this
would be a Packers win. But now, the Ravens are favored, even as a road
team at Lambeau Field.
I watched the Ravens' last game, against the Titans two
weeks ago. They lost, 23-20, but they did almost nothing in the game
until the 4th quarter. Sounds a little like the Packers? One of
these teams should just pretend it is the 4th quarter at the beginning of the
game! Obviously, the defense plays differently in the 4th quarter, and in
the case of the Titans-Ravens games, the two 4th quarter TDs can to some extent
be seen as garbage-time TDs. But still, how refreshing it would be to see
the Packers come out in an up-tempo offense at the beginning of the game, and
maybe put some points on the board right away.
Anyway, the Ravens, statistically, have the worst
passing offense in the league (although it is only fair to note that if you
limited the stats to the last 4 weeks, the Packers would be right down there,
too). They have an above average rushing offense, and an above average passing defense, but they are nothing special against the run. So the
Packers can potentially pull off an "upset" in this game, if only
they game-plan appropriately for the Ravens. An offensive game plan
emphasizing the running game, and including short passes as an extension of the running game, makes sense to me. On defense, this is one of
those teams where the Packers should concentrate on the run and force Joe
Flacco to beat them in the air.
When the Ravens come tapping at the door of Lambeau Field on
Sunday, let's hope the Packers send them away with nothing to show for it.
Soon again I heard a tapping somewhat louder than before. Surely," said I, "surely that is something at my window lattice: Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore — Let my heart be still a moment and this mystery explore; — 'Tis the wind and nothing more."
Edgar Allan Poe, The Raven
